Thank you so very much for that question.
This is a huge topic. I'll try to make a few comments in the time allotted and will be happy to follow up.
First of all, from a theoretical point of view, it comes down to whether protection by data strengthens or competition strengthens. We found that, in open competition, YouTubers have become, in 91 countries, the number one exporters and are diverse without any quotas, mostly equal to or in some cases in excess to StatsCan.
That's for the creators, but in our research, we asked both groups what they thought about YouTube. I direct you to figures 2.21 and 3.15. Canadians really cherish the diversity they see on YouTube, and 90% of Canadians—we were so surprised by this data that we parsed it for age, for geography and for language—don't search for Canadian content. They search for the content they want to watch, and they treasure the access to global content.
As well, a majority of Canadian creators, when we asked them this, felt that if there were a sort of artificial discoverability imposed on their channel, which means they would lose the ability to organically rise in other countries, which directly impacts their revenue—that's a long explanation that probably should happen at some point, but anyway—they would be very negatively impacted by that.
Canadian consumers and creators on YouTube are aligned in wanting this to remain an open platform. Does that answer your question?