I don't think I said the CRTC shouldn't be regulating. On the broadcast side, I think what I've tried to say is that user content and the work coming out of the Internet is not broadcast, so that ought to be outside of the CRTC's remit, because it's inappropriate to put it in this regulatory structure.
On the broadcast side, to respond to your question, the CRTC is the appropriate place, but there are other issues. You noted that it's not local production. With respect, that's often not true. For example, Jusqu'au déclin, produced by Netflix, had a Canadian production company, screenwriter, director, lead performers, director of photography, production designer, composer and editor—everything Canadian—and yet it's not treated as Canadian. I can name others: The Willoughbys, ARQ, In the Tall Grass. The reality is that we are seeing a lot of Canadian production from all of the major streaming services.
One of the problems that we face, whether in Quebec or outside of Quebec, is that we have definitions that frankly don't work if what we are truly trying to do is tell Canadian stories. As I noted off the top, one of the most ardent supporters of regulation in this space, Peter Grant, has himself said the Canadian content rules don't even require them to be Canadian stories. If your goal in this legislation is to ensure that this happens, then surely one of the things you need to do is ensure that the regulations themselves better reflect those Canadian stories.