Thank you, Madam Chair.
I would like to speak to Mr. Hatfield.
I fully understand that, when you are part of an unregulated world, it is always alarming when someone wants to start regulating that sector. So I understand your apprehensions.
That said, having heard the arguments that have been presented, including on the process the CRTC uses before regulatory measures—consisting of hearings—don't you think you could, on the contrary, have your voice heard better and be understood by preparing a good representation to the CRTC? Ultimately, could you not benefit from that regulation?
I will explain what I mean. It is often said that algorithms are a tool for discoverability, but it is not necessary to use algorithms to discover new artists. The recommendation can be made in various ways. That may be an area where you could present very worthwhile arguments to the CRTC when regulations are being developed.
Don't you think it would be better to try to determine how that those regulations can benefit you instead of hurting you?