I'll try to be brief.
I think it would be critical, first of all, for the commission to report annually on how it is actually implementing subsection 3(1), and also section 5. If we don't know how it is doing its job, we're unable to put pressure on the commission to actually change what it's doing.
In terms of timing, the commission currently publishes next to no useful information about the timing of its work or how it is actually achieving work. In some ways one could argue that the information it provides Parliament now misleads people about what it is actually managing to achieve. We provided detailed recommendations in our submissions.