Madam Chair, I thank the member for the question.
We divide this into two pieces, but the heart of it is, frankly, that we think the minister's right. When the minister says, no algorithms and no to cat videos, we think the language in the bill should reflect that.
On algorithms, I would say that proposed subsection 9.1(8) can be amended to make it less about that particular section and more about the act, therefore prohibiting requirements regarding algorithms in anything from the act. We can provide that language as a follow-up. With regard to user-generated content, I would say that the individual platforms are probably the best to get hard language on, but I would tell you that we support that.
I would just go back again to my opening statement about this. This has gone from being a hypothetical with nervous lawyers in the back of the room concerned that the language isn't clear enough to, following the CRTC chair's explanation that there is wiggle room, now something we think the committee should address to, again, reflect what the minister said.