This is really shocking to me. This is almost like starting a union but taking money from management. This is an extreme conflict of interest. You are, on one hand, saying that you represent the best interests of individuals, but you're taking money from the organizations. We've heard from witnesses that three-quarters of Canadians who are eligible to receive money from these platforms receive zero dollars, yet you're taking money for a status quo.
How is this not an extreme conflict of interest?
Back to my original point, were you lying to this committee when you first appeared?