To echo Lisa's comments, I would just add one thing. Having two standards, as has been pointed out, is potentially harmful and is unnecessary, quite frankly. In our comments up front, we talked about the fact that it's not just who owns it and it's not just what platform the content is exhibited on, but who makes it. Who makes it are the Canadians, both in the key creative positions—directors, designers, writers and so on—and the crews, and the crews that Warren referenced and he works with on a day-to-day basis.
There's no need to have two sets of standards. Also, if I can demystify something, there is plenty of flexibility already built into the system, so there have been calls for revisiting or perhaps recalibrating the requirements around Canadian content. We're not calling for that, but it's a sensible process that will take place. There's no need to double.... There's a rule of thumb that says you don't need two rules to do the job of one. If that revision and that analysis is called for, that will take place. It doesn't have to take place in the scope of the act. When it does take place, stakeholders like the DGC, ACTRA and others will be there. Any changes or modifications will then be applicable equally to the Canadian broadcasters in the current system and the online players, including the foreign ones who are doing business.
Let's have one standard. Clarity equals predictability and sustainability, so I think that's what we're looking for. Having multiple standards just confuses things.