I'll start again.
Going back to.... I think we're aligned on the intent here. When it comes to the role of how it should be reflected, whether it's in legislation or a policy directive, the creator community merits certainty of how their content, which is their livelihood, will be regulated going forward. That's why I think it's absolutely appropriate and very achievable, by the way, to reflect that in the legislative text. We don't have to put the livelihoods of creators at risk to support Canadian musicians and artists. I think we're all very collaborative and smart people, and this is something that can absolutely be done in the text.
It's not clear to me why we would give this expansive discretion to the CRTC in the text of the law, when we're in the premise that this is not going to be regulated. If the premise is that it's not to be regulated, I think it makes the most sense to have that reflected in the text, rather than handing over the authority to future governments to simply make that change going forward.