Just to clarify, if I understand this correctly, Madam Chair, whether the debate resumed or not, I believe you ruled the subamendment admissible. Mr. Housefather, after reading the written copy of the subamendment, challenged your decision on that ruling. In this case, there should be no debate and we should proceed to a vote.
The question is whether the decision of the chair be sustained. Should the decision of the chair to rule the subamendment admissible be sustained?
Is that correct?