Sorry, let's be really clear here then. When you say “potential stretching” could take place in how this bill is used to require these different platforms to curate content in a specific way according to whatever the government mandates through the CRTC, what are you potentially concerned about?
Today it looks innocent. It looks like it's just propping up Canadian content, even though it's an antiquated definition, and that certainly is harmful in and of itself. Nevertheless, beyond that do you have any other concerns?