The goal here, as I understand it from Mr. Nater, and the point of reference is revenues in Canada. That will be an important reference point for streaming services because, for example, their financial contributions to the system are likely to be considered in reference to things like their revenues that are earned in Canada.
The government has always expressed optimism that with respect to the big household names that operate in Canada, if the bill is adopted, we would have their co-operation as the CRTC starts to implement it in terms of providing the kind of information here. If ever there were an instance in which there was a service that, to your question, played hardball and claimed that it didn't have any revenues in Canada, etc., then that is a question on which the CRTC would have to make a determination with respect to whether it would start engaging in court proceedings to be able to exercise the powers of the court to compel that kind of information.
With respect to the big services, again, our expectation is that they are good corporate citizens who, if the bill is passed, will work to comply with their legal obligations.