I am sorry, on the actual amendment CPC-1.02, which is what we're dealing with right now, I know that Mr. Nater read “annually” into it and that we were going to vote on it. Mrs. Thomas was very clear that she wanted it to be a subamendment and not taken into the main motion as Mr. Nater had read it.
Now, as far as I'm concerned with Mr. Nater reading it in, we did not have the desire to have a subamendment or there was no need for a subamendment, but now we have a subamendment on the floor, and we need to vote on it. I'm sorry.