Thank you for the question, Mr. Waugh.
I believe I understand what Mr. Nater, the mover here, is seeking to accomplish by establishing a hard, financial threshold.
As I highlighted earlier, the government does recognize that there are going to be instances, given the wide variety of online broadcasters, where certain classes of online broadcasters should not be subject to regulatory obligations.
The potential mischief on this one is the one I highlighted earlier with respect to certain Canadian services. Again, I think our public broadcaster, CBC/Radio-Canada, would be a good example. Their services—CBC Gem, for example, or TOU.TV—would qualify as an online broadcasting undertaking. The challenge with the proposal from the government's perspective is that it is potentially also excluding online undertakings that could make a very real contribution to achieving the policy objectives of the act. Online undertakings aren't exclusively the big streaming services.
I understand that those big streaming services such as Netflix, Disney+ or Amazon certainly likely exceed that threshold, but there are other online undertakings in the Canadian context that may be very well suited to contributing to some policy objectives of the act and may not achieve that threshold.