Thank you so much, Madam Chair.
I am also very sympathetic to this amendment, but I see the limitations in the way that it's drafted. I was wondering if Mr. Ripley could advise.
As opposed to the way this amendment is drafted, if in paragraph 3(7)(p) on line 40 you left the wording, “programming that is accessible without barriers to persons with disabilities should be provided within the Canadian broadcasting system” and added “including, without limitation, closed caption services and video services available to assist persons living with a visual impairment”, would that fall within the existing framework to a point that the department would believe it was within the intention of the law?