Madam Chair, I think we want to achieve the same thing. The concern is that the way this is drafted may not fall within the framework of something as strong as paragraph 3(7)(p).
If we were to take paragraph 3(7)(p) and add the words to the end of it, “including, without limitation, closed captioning services and video services available to assist persons living with a visual impairment”, I think we've left exactly the wording and have the same strength. It's not limiting it to those two things, but making sure we include those who are concerned that those two things be included.
If Mr. Nater wanted to make the amendment that way, I would certainly support it.