Madam Chair, I agree with the spirit of the amendment. I honestly do. I agree with pretty much everything you've said. The problem is that if we pass something like this, it will be challenging to define age.
I have a 16-year-old daughter. She watches things that a 16-year-old watches, and I don't know if this would prevent her from watching something that's innocent enough but could be considered sexually explicit. I don't know what the definition of sexually explicit is in this bill, so it's hard for me to support, even though I agree with the spirit of what the member's trying to achieve.
It just opens up too much to interpretation. To go back to the Conservatives' point, we haven't seen regulations that would define some of these pieces, so I'm a bit hesitant to support the proposed amendment, even though I agree with the spirit of what the member's trying to achieve.
Thank you.