Let me be very clear on those points.
The 2003 situation is a circumstance. It's an incident. We have not received any detail, or at least I haven't. Our insurance company has not received any details, so it would be very difficult at this particular point in time, sir, for me to decipher as to whether there is coverage and whether coverage would apply under the general liability or sexual misconduct policy.
Insofar as, let's call it, the Carcillo claim goes, we've received a writ. We can see what may be covered and what may not be covered, so we're in a much better position with respect to that particular claim.
My statement would be to the effect that I would defer answering that question until I had all the facts.