Thank you, Madam Chair. There was a lot packed in there. I'll respond to the question about support for senior leadership.
Our board, frankly, does not share the view that senior leadership should be replaced on the basis of what we consider to be substantial misinformation and unduly cynical attacks. I appreciate that others disagree with us, but our positions are based on the information that we have and an understanding that Hockey Canada has an excellent reputation.
I do not fault senior management or the board with respect to the way the 2018 sexual assault incident was handled. I believe the appropriate steps were taken in terms of contacting the police, retaining an independent law firm to investigate the allegations and contacting Sport Canada.
I understand there's criticism with respect to senior management having in place the national equity fund—I'm a parent of two young kids—but I believe it's a responsible risk management practice.
Those appear to be two fundamental allegations from critics who are calling for leadership change. In the board's view, we need stability at this time. We have nine members of the board up for re-election or election later this year. We're waiting on the results of a Supreme Court of Canada governance review, which, while it may be expensive, is one of the most important things Hockey Canada has done in its 100-year history.