I understand there is a perspective out there. With great respect, I disagree with it. We want to see consequences for the players.
The woman in this circumstance did not identify and refused to identify the players. What Hockey Canada has done is decide to resolve the matter in a way that was trauma-centred, victim-centred or complainant-centred. At the same time, we have an investigation that's ongoing. We put it in place so players will have to participate in that investigation, so the truth can be discovered. If they are found to have violated the code of conduct, they will be held responsible, and that's a process that's ongoing.
I absolutely think there needs to be accountability. I absolutely reject that we've condoned this. We took a view to try to respectfully deal with the wishes and perspectives of the woman.
I can point to a very recent example of exactly what we were trying to avoid by resolving this matter and not pushing it through the litigation process. That's the story about Jake Virtanen. He was charged with sexual assault recently from an incident in 2017. In 2021 or 2022, the criminal trial resolved—