Thank you so much, Mr. Brind'Amour. I have a follow-up question for you.
I was kind of shocked. Mr. Nater and Mr. Housefather asked you a direct question multiple times. I was shocked, when I looked you up, to find that you're a litigator yourself.
I'm not going to ask the question again, but I would expect that as member of the Quebec bar and as a witness under subpoena.... Why do you think you don't need to answer a direct question from elected members of Parliament under oath?
You may have contempt for this proceeding, but is that really a sign of the leadership at Hockey Canada and the leadership you provided?