Let me be a bit more specific, then.
Every leading voice having to do with organizational change would say that the way to produce a desired culture is to start with the leader. Now, you seem to be very insistent that this leader needs to be protected, that he should be kept in place and that somehow organizational change or a culture shift is still possible. You're saying that starts with you. You just said you're a very instrumental piece in that change, but you don't seem to be open to changing the culture by starting with the leader.
What I'm hearing from you and Hockey Canada is that there are these words that are being nuanced. There are these platitudes that are being made in order to try to pacify the public, whether that be the public at large, players or parents. I'm not seeing meaningful structures being put in place in order to generate the change that is needed in order to create a Hockey Canada that we as Canadians can be proud of, that players can join, that parents can be part of and know that the players are going to be in the best care possible.
I'm just curious why. Why is the leader of this organization being protected rather than being held accountable?