Thank you. I appreciate the question.
I think that bar of two journalists is a pretty low bar. I respect the fact that there are small publishers of community papers, say, that may have a struggle in some ways, but I think the point is that there are probably a lot of people who are used as freelancers, stringers and whatnot, and maybe for some of those organizations it motivates them to bring those people on as full-time employees.
If that's a piece of the legislation that motivates getting more journalists employed in newsrooms, then I think that's a good thing, rather than us trying to bend ourselves backwards into a pretzel to figure out a way to make sure that certain newsrooms are allowed to continue to use part-timers, stringers, volunteers or what have you. I think two is a pretty low number, and I think the hiring of more journalists in newsrooms is something we should be encouraging.