Thank you. I think that's a good point. While the intent might be good, to help facilitate journalism, to help make sure Canadians are given access to news, to ensure that the public good is protected—I can get behind those ideals—this legislation actually appears to do the exact opposite, which is the point you've raised here today.
My next question is this. If a news source, a publisher, doesn't want Twitter or Facebook or Google to be able to promote their site or provide a link, they have the ability to opt out—but they don't. They don't opt out. They seem to be benefiting, then, from these platforms that are perpetuating their links. Otherwise, why stay in?
Do you care to comment?