Okay, that's fine, but what we understood—again, from whistle-blowers—is that “Facebook did not use a 'standard canary process'” to test this algorithm's precision to identify or prevent overblocking before an action. Despite clear notice the lockdown was affecting far more sites than publicly acknowledged, which would normally have triggered a pause or rollback, senior executives ordered the full rollout to take effect within hours.
How, then, do we trust the fact that this was a technical error? Can I ask whether you did a post-mortem in Australia, and can you assure us the same situation won't reproduce itself in Canada?