Okay, thank you.
This is a misunderstanding of the DNI. It's a very simple thing that's done. It's a computer decision. There are millions of them. What should be done is that, if there's a complaint, the DNI should explain how its algorithm works: that it's fair, that it's not unjust, that it's not undue, etc. In that case, the reverse onus that is in the legislation—which means the allegation is true unless rebutted—makes sense because it's the algorithm of the DNI that we're talking about. They create it and set it up, and they should be able to show that it doesn't discriminate against or disadvantage anybody.
Thank you, Madam Chair.