What happened with the JCPA, unfortunately, is that large news publishers were excluded from participating in some of the protections. This would be like The New York Times, The Washington Post, maybe The Wall Street Journal. The rationale was that they are big enough to negotiate their own compensation, thank you very much. However, it turns out that even they, as large as they are relative to other newspapers, are atomistic with respect to Google and Facebook, so in my opinion, this was a mistake in the JCPA.
You don't want to exclude the “bigs” from the negotiation for the same reason that you don't want to exclude, for example, LeBron James from the players union. It's possible that LeBron James doesn't benefit as much as some of the rookies or veterans, but just having him in the coalition strengthens the coalition in its dealings against the individual NBA owners. I understand the politics, but I think if an economist could have designed it, the big news publishers would have stayed in, so when we go to the negotiations—