Through the chair, thank you for your question, Mrs. Thomas.
The clause in question is an interpretive clause. It was put there to clearly signal that the regime should be applied in a manner consistent with journalistic independence. There is no definition of journalistic independence provided for in the act as currently drafted.
My observation on the motion you're moving is that it includes one element of journalistic independence. We did look at how various journalism organizations would define the concept and the idea that it's independence from government, commercial or other interests seeking to subvert content for their own purposes.
My observation on the motion on the floor would be that it obviously includes an element of that, in the independence from government, but journalistic independence I think is broader than just government.