I would beg to disagree with you, Madam Chair. I think the colour is very clear and not confused at all.
I support the motion by Mr. Housefather and the timelines involved. The organizations maintain minutes. It's not as if we're asking them to put together something new. This is something that should be absolutely available to us. At the same time, we do need to give translation teams the opportunity to go through the minutes and actually translate them. That will take a number of weeks. If we then choose in February, when we reconvene, to continue this study and broaden it, as I think as a committee we've already indicated, then I think this is the best approach. The timelines are good.
I was thinking of proposing the same thing Mr. Champoux did, which was to add some national organizations. I am glad he proposed that amendment to Mr. Housefather's motion.
I think we have everything. It is the responsibility of the committee to request the minutes and then have them translated. That will enable us to address this issue when we return in February.
I support the amendment and the motion.