I realize that. I got the sense that everyone seemed to be in agreement, but I am wrong with that sense, because obviously you are not in agreement, so let us call the vote on Mr. Champoux's subamendment. The subamendment is on proposed subclause 19(1.1), that it be on request of “both” parties.
Do I hear any opposition to the subamendment?
(Subamendment agreed to [See Minutes of Proceedings])
Now we go to the subamendment from Mr. Housefather, which removes the words “up to” in proposed paragraphs 19(1)(a), (b) and (c).
Is there any opposition?
(Subamendment agreed to [See Minutes of Proceedings])
Shall the motion as amended carry?
Yes, Ms. Thomas.