Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Certainly, all of us would like to see less hate and less misinformation out there, but I do have a concern with the subamendment by Mr. Julian. It depends on who is making the judgment about what is hate—there isn't a definition there—and about what is misinformation.
I mean, Mr. Julian loves to hate on the Conservatives, so if it were somebody like him, he would think that was okay. I wouldn't think it was okay. In terms of misinformation, I mean, the government's standing up on a daily basis saying, no, we're not banning hunting rifles, when in fact they are. They're saying that it's not misinformation, but I would say that it is.
Because it's problematic in terms of trying to define it, I think what Mr. Champoux has said, in terms of journalistic ethics and codes of ethics, is a much better place to land. I won't be supporting the subamendment.