You are correct in terms of the committee motion, Mr. Bittle. It was to have—after we had finished this clause-by-clause—Justice Cromwell as a witness.
Secondly, I think that we tried “on division” earlier in this meeting and it was rejected, so we're going to ask the question again: Is everyone prepared to look at “on division” as a means of voting instead of going through the read votes?
Go ahead, Kevin.