Thanks so much, Hedy.
I just want to echo that. The motion that Ms. Thomas put forward is a neutral motion. It basically says we're studying one component of what would be online harms, which relates to the exploitation of children, and illegal.... That doesn't relate to when a bill would or would not be tabled, which is much broader than the scope of this motion.
I think it would be a receivable amendment if you said we want to invite the Minister of Heritage to testify, on the motion, but not the way it was worded.