I agree with the spirit of the motion, Ms. Thomas. My concern is that when meetings become available and we add studies, for example, after a bill has been dealt with or because witnesses cannot come forward, we will postpone that study or choose another one because it requires four meetings.
I also think that it is an interesting study and that we should do it. By asking for a minimum of two meetings, we still give ourselves the option of holding four if we find that it is necessary. Believe me, I would be quite willing to add more if we consider that it is appropriate to do so.
This is what I propose to you, once again, very respectfully. I think that a minimum of two meetings gives us a better chance of being able to do this study in the current situation.