I think that was very wise counsel. Again, I appreciate that you took that step.
One of the things I want to ask you.... I saw a real misunderstanding out there, in some of the media, about the way you dealt with the NEF. For example, you answered the question Hockey Canada gave you by saying that of course it's appropriate to have a fund for uninsured claims. It's obvious that it's appropriate to have such a fund, if one's claims are uninsurable.
However, you went on, in your report, to criticize Hockey Canada for how it operated the fund. You said there was no proper disclosure; a lack of controls or definitions on how the money was to be used; cheques cut without proper internal disclosure and accountability; no receipts; and no record of the disclosure to members.
Would you agree that you were not exonerating Hockey Canada in your report, in terms of how they ran the NEF?