Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Thanks again, Justice Cromwell.
I have a different line of questions, but before that, there was one section of your report that intrigued me that I want to delve into with you for one second.
One of the problems I identified that I was the most disturbed about was Hockey Canada's failure to minute important board decisions, whether taken during in camera meetings or otherwise. I noticed in your report that you said that wasn't necessarily a good practice, although you did note that there may be occasions where it might be appropriate. I can't imagine anywhere where it would be appropriate to not minute a decision of a board to settle a case. I can't see how that could be appropriate. Certainly, information related to the identification of a person could be excised.
Can you explain where you would think it would be appropriate for the board to actually make a decision to pay an amount to anyone and not minute that to have a future record of that decision?