No, I agree. That's why I was just.... I didn't understand exactly how it was drafted, then, because obviously, of course, they don't need to explain why they made that decision based on the advice of their lawyer that could be given in private. I just want to make sure that we all agree and that no organization in the country thinks, after reading the report, that it's okay to not minute decisions to settle a case.
Can I ask you another question?
I was intrigued by one of the things that you wrote in the report. Where you talk about the people responsible, you write:
It is also time for other entities and stakeholders to reflect on their own roles and responsibilities. Some who have been quick to announce their loss of confidence in Hockey Canada have been slow to acknowledge their own past contributions to its troubles. The underlying causes of the current crisis are not of recent origin. The Members have controlled who is on the Board.
Could you speak about that to say why you put that in there?