Thank you, Chair.
Absolutely, I think Mr. Bittle makes exactly the points of why we need to support this motion. I'm not at all opposed to adding more time. I think the intent to shine a light on what went on with Hockey Canada brought a lot more to light than maybe we were expecting.
One thing that will be really important is that this will be very similar to the sexual misconduct in the military investigations, where it was at defence committee at the same time that it was at status of women. We had to be very clear about the scope of what one was going to cover and the scope of what the other was going to cover. I think we would have to wait for the chairs to have that discussion.
My suggestion would be that this committee would be more appropriate to look at the governance that is needed. What is the governance from the federal government's point of view down to Sport Canada's point of view? Perhaps that lets status of women take a different direction, which may be the protection of survivors and some of the other things that go in place.
Definitely, I think we can just agree that we were going to have at least two meetings. It's going to start next year. Then at one of those meetings, perhaps we could get an update from the chair, who's had discussions with the chair of the status of women committee, to see where we will go from there. From there, we'll know how many witnesses, who we should call and that sort of thing.
Thank you.