As you'll understand, my task was to assess the governance of Hockey Canada, not to do a review of Sport Canada. I more than had my hands full in 89 days to do Hockey Canada. It was not practical to go further, and I had no mandate to do so.
I did set out in the report some of the current aspects of Hockey Canada's involvement in these issues. I wanted to set out the full legal context within which the governance of Hockey Canada has to be assessed. I noted some academic writing to the effect that Sport Canada perhaps ought to play a more robust role. I did note the sorts of conditions that were included in the contribution agreement, which is their behaviour modification tool. I also learned in the course of my review that, in that context, Sport Canada is in the midst of revising, as I think the minister and other officials indicated in their testimony before you.
I'm in no position to say what is the best or what they ought to do. I simply tried to note what the existing situation is and what is said is being done as we speak.