Good.
Coming back to what Mr. Shields mentioned, I think we all understand that the initial granting of the monies was through a process that needed to be fixed. I mean, nobody was responsible for making a mistake because that was what the process was.
I think the clarity that people want is why there was no accountability for the time frame between the time that the minister was first alerted of this on July 18 and the actual suspension on August 19. I think that's where people are confused. That's not a process question; that's a question of whether things were taken seriously.
Do you have any response to that?