Is it okay that I answer in English?
The reason I think restorative justice is so dangerous is that I've seen it put in process at both of those schools.
The first school tried to use restorative justice in order to.... They had put the athletes into the position of saying publicly that they were liars when they reported abuse. They were now supposed to do restorative justice to clear their names, I guess, or get forgiven by the coaches who had abused them. It was psychotic, essentially. Parents refused in scathing terms to have their children put through yet another manipulation.
In the second school that I was at, as I said in my statement very quickly, they offered restorative justice because they were trying to get the principal off so he wouldn't get sex abuse charges. Then they decided that the girl was so mentally ill that she wouldn't be able to handle it. This is what happened to her brain. She basically couldn't tell if she was the victim or the perpetrator, just like they tried to do with the other students by the time they were done.
Restorative justice was developed by Katy Hutchison. Her husband had been beaten to death by drunken young people at a random party. They didn't even know who he was. They went to jail. She decided that this teenager, this young 20-something, should be saved and that he shouldn't spend the rest of his life in jail with a criminal record. She set out to restore justice between him and her. It had been random drunken activity.
That is not the same thing as an adult in a position of trust and authority who abuses children. You can't compare those two scenarios. There's no place for restorative justice in this sport situation we're dealing with. It's manipulative and destructive.