I share many of your observations, but I don't agree with your conclusion, which in my view contributes to the culture of silence. That much is clear if we don't try to get to the bottom of this. I feel money should not factor into this at all.
If there were an independent public inquiry on abuse in sports, would you be called in to justify all of the subsidies you have received or explain situations where there is an appearance of conflict of interest? They could potentially put you in a compromising situation and perhaps prevent you from really fighting for the athletes.
What explains the fact that what you are saying is completely different from what all of your peers are saying? Indeed, many university researchers have already spoken to that.