Well, of course, she wasn't involved in that at all. She wasn't part of the executive board or any of those decisions, because that was 2008 and her role is much more recent than that, but I think the questions are these.
Why was it necessary to have this “negotiated exit”, as I described it in my remarks, which allows somebody to leave an organization and for which the real reasons are not revealed and never enter the public domain?
Then, why did they fail to keep records? There was no investigation report. There were no board minutes. There was no transparency in the governance process.
Also, what have you done now to change how those things would be handled were you required to do some other investigation in 2023?