I'm sorry, but I did not see Mr. Reed's testimony in front of the committee, so I don't really have a comment on that.
I think it's not the case that you're powerless to do anything. For example, a coach has to have a coaching licence and report to the coaching association as to what's gone on, but then you can't have a negative explanation for why the termination has occurred, so they don't make those reports. That then allows the perpetrator to hide behind a “personal reasons” exit and allows the sport body to really justify in its own mind that it has no basis on which to take any further action. There is a basis on which it can take further action. It would be by way of reporting to other organizations and influencing whether or not the person could continue to coach, for example, in the illustration you're using.