Thank you. Then I have time for one more question.
Whistle-blowers disclosed multiple company documents in the United States to the United States Department of Justice. As part of a deck, one slide called “product readiness timeline” states that ideal takedown timing is after legislation has been passed by the Senate but before it receives royal assent. This is, again, the Australian example. The same deck shows the takedown plans needed to be ready for February 5, a week before Facebook expected earliest passage of the bill.
Ms. Curran, that would seem to indicate that the takedown was essentially to maximize negotiating leverage in Australia.
Is the Canadian model similar? Is the threat similar to what was happening in Australia to maximize negotiating leverage, or is it different?