You're right, but you were part of the process. All of which is to say that if you felt it was appropriate for Mr. Clegg to be here today, you might have been more forceful about suggesting that. But that's not the point I'm trying to make.
The fact remains that after discussing it, this committee agreed to redo the process, and to offer an invitation to Meta in response to its offer to collaborate, and for Mr. Clegg to agree to come before the committee.
The wording of the motion had been clear since March 20. The way it was framed became public on March 20. You were therefore aware of the title of the study and the wording of this motion.
I'm trying to understand the attitude that would lead the president, Mr. Clegg, to change his mind even though he had more or less promised to appear before the committee and was already aware of the content of the motion under study. I must say that it seems pretty straightforward to me.