Evidence of meeting #83 for Canadian Heritage in the 44th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was money.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Isabelle Mondou  Deputy Minister, Department of Canadian Heritage
Thomas Owen Ripley  Associate Assistant Deputy Minister, Cultural Affairs, Department of Canadian Heritage
Eric Doiron  Chief Financial Officer, Department of Canadian Heritage

12:35 p.m.

Liberal

Chris Bittle Liberal St. Catharines, ON

But I won't decide what other people watch. I want to make sure that's clear. It's a limited role that I have as parliamentary secretary.

Thank you so much, Minister. I have just a few seconds.

Again, I'd like to highlight your point. Even if we wanted to, with tens of millions or hundreds of millions of videos uploaded a day just on one streaming site, YouTube, and so few employees at the CRTC, it wouldn't be possible to participate in or to engage in the conspiracy theories—if they were true—even though they continue to be propagated by the opposition.

I think my time is up, but I want to say thank you for being here, Minister.

12:35 p.m.

Conservative

The Vice-Chair Conservative Kevin Waugh

Thank you, Mr. Bittle.

I'm going to make an arbitrary decision.

We have 22 minutes before the hour. Minister and department officials, if you don't mind, we would like to do a short fourth round, because you have committed to us until one o'clock.

Here's what I'm going to do. I'm going to give the Conservatives and Liberals five minutes each and the NDP and the Bloc two and half minutes each.

That's what we'll do, and then we have some voting on the main estimates.

12:35 p.m.

An hon. member

It should be five minutes for everyone.

12:35 p.m.

An hon. member

C'est inéquitable.

12:35 p.m.

Conservative

The Vice-Chair Conservative Kevin Waugh

Both of you have received generous time from Mr. Waugh today.

12:35 p.m.

Some hon. members

Oh, oh!

12:35 p.m.

Conservative

The Vice-Chair Conservative Kevin Waugh

Anyway, let's go with five minutes.

It will be Ms. Lantsman for the Conservatives.

12:35 p.m.

Conservative

Melissa Lantsman Conservative Thornhill, ON

Sure. Thanks.

I want to go back to the policy directive that hasn't been issued and the fact that the CRTC has launched consultations or will be launching consultations. I think it's confusing for Canadians to understand what those consultations are about.

I understand you're going to say that the CRTC is at arm's length, but what do you think those consultations are about if there are no policy directives on the table?

12:35 p.m.

Liberal

Pablo Rodriguez Liberal Honoré-Mercier, QC

I don't work with the CRTC on what they're doing at the moment. What I'm working on is making sure that I come up with the draft policy as soon as possible.

What I understand is that they're consulting generally more broadly, and that those consultations will be adapted when they receive the—

12:35 p.m.

Conservative

Melissa Lantsman Conservative Thornhill, ON

They're just consulting.

12:40 p.m.

Liberal

Pablo Rodriguez Liberal Honoré-Mercier, QC

They are consulting on Bill C-11. However, on the general aspect of the transformation, there's already a lot of stuff that we know. We know that we're modernizing a lot that should have been modernized a long time ago. They're looking at that, and then they are going to receive the policy direction and they're going to adapt it to that.

12:40 p.m.

Conservative

Melissa Lantsman Conservative Thornhill, ON

Have there been any political staff who have met with the CRTC with regard to any of the directives?

12:40 p.m.

Liberal

Pablo Rodriguez Liberal Honoré-Mercier, QC

Not me, no.

I don't think so.

12:40 p.m.

Conservative

Melissa Lantsman Conservative Thornhill, ON

“I don't think so”, or “no”?

12:40 p.m.

Liberal

Pablo Rodriguez Liberal Honoré-Mercier, QC

No.

May 29th, 2023 / 12:40 p.m.

Conservative

Melissa Lantsman Conservative Thornhill, ON

Okay. I'll tell you why I'm asking.

Recently the CRTC published a web page. It was called “Myths and Facts”. I'm sure you've seen it. It has probably come up in your media monitoring, since you made it better after the Laith Marouf case.

On this page, the CRTC characterizes concerns held by the opposition—and frankly, content creators, academics and everybody we heard who talked about Bill C-11—as myths. It only takes a little bit of critical thinking to see that the facts espoused by the CRTC on that website are directly parroting the talking points that you have used as a minister on Bill C-11.

I want to know whether there was any formal instruction to the CRTC on any of this.

12:40 p.m.

Liberal

Pablo Rodriguez Liberal Honoré-Mercier, QC

No, not at all. No, but....

12:40 p.m.

Conservative

Melissa Lantsman Conservative Thornhill, ON

Was it something that the CRTC did on its own?

12:40 p.m.

Liberal

Pablo Rodriguez Liberal Honoré-Mercier, QC

Ms. Lantsman, if something is not true, it's very possible that I would say it's not true and that they would say it's not true because it's not a fact. I think one of the problems around the debate on Bill C-11 is that there are a lot of things that are not facts and have nothing to do with the bill, zero.

Freedom of expression has nothing to do with Bill C-11. It is a parallel discussion that some people wanted to initiate, and so they would not discuss the bill. The bill is simply asking the streamers to contribute to Canadian culture.

12:40 p.m.

Conservative

Melissa Lantsman Conservative Thornhill, ON

When Canadians, academics, content creators—everybody who had issue with the bill—see the CRTC consulting widely, without the policy directives that you said Parliament would see, and then see the same talking points that you've used being parroted directly on the CRTC website, you could see why that would concern Canadians, correct?

12:40 p.m.

Liberal

Pablo Rodriguez Liberal Honoré-Mercier, QC

Well, you can look at that way, but once again, if there are things that are not true, they can say what they want in terms of discussions. I don't speak for them. They are totally independent, and I'll always respect that. One of the fundamental things in our democracy is to respect the independence of those institutions.

12:40 p.m.

Conservative

Marilyn Gladu Conservative Sarnia—Lambton, ON

Minister, I want to finish up by talking about funding for sport. You know that the committee is undertaking a study of safe sport, and I see that you have about $265 million in the budget.

I'm concerned because Hockey Canada has only implemented six of its 36 recommendations, and they're receiving funding again.

The Minister of Sport, after hearing from all of the athletes that they want a public inquiry, has not come forward with that and has instead implemented an accountability mechanism in Sport Canada, when Sport Canada was identified by all of the athletes as being part of the problem and not part of the solution.

I want to know whether you could tell us how much, if any, of that $265 million in your budget is going to support the Minister of Sport's initiatives.

12:40 p.m.

Liberal

Pablo Rodriguez Liberal Honoré-Mercier, QC

You have probably invited the Minister of Sport to come here to discuss the estimates. It's under her. It's not under me.

If you didn't invite her, it's....

12:40 p.m.

Conservative

Marilyn Gladu Conservative Sarnia—Lambton, ON

Okay.

Well, I'm glad to hear that none of your funds are going towards that.

Could you tell us, then, what the funding from Heritage under “Sport” is going to?

12:40 p.m.

Liberal

Pablo Rodriguez Liberal Honoré-Mercier, QC

I don't touch sport. I'm sorry. I'd love to. I'm a big hockey fan and a soccer fan. I practise a lot of sports, but—