Indeed, that is the question.
Given your experience and involvement, I'd like you to tell us about the following phenomenon. There seems to be a closed community of experts, when it comes to the people working within the various organizations, such as the Office of the Sport Integrity Commissioner, the Canadian Olympic committee and Own the Podium. Indeed, experience working in a similar field seems to confer a significant advantage to being able to work in another. This means that sports culture never changes, because those people are trained using a cookie cutter approach. But that cookie cutter has contributed to creating a culture of silence and pressure on athletes to perform, which has led to cases of abuse.
Does that situation mean that, as a committee, we need to report those facts to ensure that changes are made to how we value the résumés of the people we want to put in positions of authority over athletes?