I'd like to go back to some earlier comments to clarify.
On the one hand, you were discussing the statute of limitations in terms of victims and survivors being able to tell their stories. At the same time—not through you, but perhaps from some of the questions—there's a veiled criticism of the London Police Service's investigation into the Hockey Canada incident. To clarify, I think the reopened investigation has been going on for less than a year.
Given the difficulty of cases involving sexual assault, should there be a time limit on police investigations? Doesn't that fit into saying that there should be a statute of limitations? It doesn't exist in cases of what we would call indictable offences—you would call them felonies.