You have to impose time frames. If you have an investigation for 10 years, is there any evidence? After 10 years, if you don't have any evidence, what's going on? You need to have some kind of evidence.
Also, when there's a case against people, take those people out so the rest can move forward. It shouldn't affect generations of hockey.
There has to be an analysis that goes forward. You can't just say, “Oh, I'm going to continue this investigation for years and years”, and then stall hockey, its players and generations. That's unconscionable. It's also very unsportsmanlike. There's a clock in every game, isn't there? Where is the time out for law enforcement? Either they have a case or they don't. I dismiss cases in front of me all the time. If they have a case, they can build it against those few, and the rest should go forward.
They should clean it up. There have to be clear policies, reporting procedures and time limits, and there has to be an understanding of ethical and legal boundaries and time frames.