You're talking about two different things. The statute of limitations is for a victim who's traumatized and who may not even remember they were assaulted because the body does not let them. The body says, “I'm going to save my life first.” They may not remember or be able to come forward with their trauma.
When we're talking about an investigation, there has to be some finality or some closure. There has to be something, so if they're stopping a hockey team from performing or they're investigating a person, they're not stopping their lives completely. They're really apples and oranges.
If the time limit is, for example, five years, why not put more officers on it? Why not put a bigger investigative team? If they find nothing, maybe there's nothing to find and they can close it. If there's more evidence, they can reopen it. Why are you pulling funding, stopping hockey and doing all these things to the whole team? If there's a bad egg who's being investigated, pull them out, pay them or do what needs to be done there and continue the team with a different coach.
There are lots of options. I don't know why those options have not been explored. Why would you do that to a whole team that hasn't been involved in this? I think the options there have not been fully explored as to how they can go forward with an investigation in a timely manner and still have the sport continue.